Splitsider

 
Wednesday, March 9th, 2011
10

Milhouse-ian Characters: An Appreciation

The unwieldy behemoth known as The Simpsons has had a massive, indelible impact on popular culture. Its characters are iconic, and to many embody particular archetypes of characters you find in the world of comedy. There are so many great characters on the show who deserve to be lauded to the heavens, but there is one character I would like to focus on: Milhouse Van Houten.

Milhouse is so perfectly indicative of a particular brand of comedic character I go as far as to call such characters “Milhouse-ian,” though that may also be owed to the amount of time I’ve invested in the world of The Simpsons. Barney Gumble isn’t the first comical drunk, but he’s the first thing I think of when I think of such characters. Milhouse lives an existence that can only be described as tragicomic. He is perpetually beleaguered and put upon by a cruel, uncaring world, a world that includes his closest (and perhaps only) friend Bart Simpson. In a world currently (and hopefully temporarily) swept up in Charlie Sheen’s bizarre preoccupation with the concept of “winning,” Milhouse certainly could be held up as a manifestation of “losing.”

Milhouse-ian characters are almost always getting the short end of the stick, and through no fault of their own I might add. Things often went wrong for George Costanza, but they were usually not only his fault, but the results of his actions were generally a well deserved comeuppance. That is not the case for the Milhouse Van Houten’s of the world. Milhouse doesn’t deserve to be bullied or to be mistreated by Bart. He doesn’t deserve to be the son of perhaps the most pathetic person in town, Kirk “Can I Borrow a Feeling?” Van Houten. Yet, this is his lot in life.

Of course, things simply going poorly for a character is not in and of itself humorous. It’s a testament to the writers of The Simpsons that they’ve been able to mine the bleak, sad existence of Milhouse for so many great jokes. You need not look further than the episode “Lisa’s Date with Density” for a virtuoso Milhouse episode, and he’s merely a side player to Lisa and Nelson’s dating. There are his awkward conversations with Lisa, which includes him agreeing to help Lisa out with the words, “What's a big sister for?” He also gets pummeled by Nelson when he mistakes a note from Lisa as being from Milhouse. Perhaps it is all best boiled down by Mr. Largo exclaiming, “Nobody likes Milhouse!”

Within the world of The Simpsons, that may nearly be true, but he certainly deserves to be admired as a comedic character. The greatness of Milhouse-ian characters only increases as more and more unfortunate events befall them. It is in the absurd nature of their perpetually uncommonly unfortunate lives that laughs are generated. Then, when the Milhouse’s of the world revel in the efficiency of their flood pants, we can revel along with them.

That’s another important aspect of the Milhouse-ian character. They don’t just simply stand on the sidelines and get put upon, but they are characters you can root for as well. Homer Simpson is, in my opinion, the greatest comedic character in the history of the medium, but he’s also a truly awful human being. He’s a great character to watch, sure, but how anybody could ever root for him is beyond me. Milhouse, on the other hand, is somebody you wouldn’t mind seeing score a win for once in his life. Then again, on the occasion that things have gone better for Milhouse it’s usually fallen flat to me. Of course, on one of those occasions he was suddenly a stereotype of an Italian man, so it was probably more in the execution than the concept of Milhouse succeeding and being happy. Nevertheless, I will always prefer the Milhouse whose doctor tells him the best he can ever hope for is to be used romantically by a girlfriend looking to cause jealousy in an old beau.

Milhouse may be the best, or at least my favorite, example of such characters, but you can find them elsewhere in the world of comedy. Staying in the world of Matt Groening, Dr. Zoidberg from Futurama is another fine example. Things go so poorly for him that the only time he had a proper home it burned down underwater. Jerry from Parks and Recreation seems to be filling the Milhouse-ian role nicely, though he also seems more resigned to his lot than other such characters. Rickety Cricket on It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia sort of fulfills the role, though he’s been a bit more involved in his own misfortune than the Milhouses of the world. The character of Butters from South Park takes the archetype to it’s grotesque extreme, because taking things to their grotesque extreme is the modus operandi of Trey Stone and Matt Parker.

It’s also quite possible, if not likely, that Milhouse didn’t originate this character type. Although, I personally can’t think of an earlier character that held the same niche that Milhouse does in their show, and I wanted so much Nick at Nite as a child that I’m probably one of the few people my age that’s seen an episode of Phyllis. The character of Agent 13 on Get Smart had kind of a similar role, but he was more of a roving sight gag than anything. He certainly didn’t have the substance to his bleak, miserable existence that Milhouse has.

Creating a character like Milhouse is a tight rope walk, because if you go too far it becomes mean spirited, but if you don’t go far enough it will lack the impact and underlying of bleakness to be funny. When you laugh at Milhouse, you are laughing at things that would be sad were they to happen in real life, particularly to a 10 year old child. However, laughing at things in comedies that would elicit negative emotions in real life is a huge portion of the genre, and perhaps part of what makes Milhouse such a thoroughly glorious character. Milhouse’s absurdly misfortunate life, and the lives of all similar characters, gives you the chance to laugh at the cruelties of life. Milhouse will always bounce back to be knocked back down again, and as long as he and other Milhouse-ian characters are filling their roles as secondary characters who rarely, if ever, catch a break, I will have a great appreciation for their existence. Everything’s coming up Milhouse, indeed.

Chris Morgan has written for Cracked, Examiner, McSweeney's, and Overthinking It, amongst others. You can follow his adventures in writing and international espionage (but mostly writing) on his Twitter.

  • bert19

    paul pfeiffer from the wonder years = the first "milhouse"

  • http://popcornapocalypse.blogspot.com colinfisher

    Is Milhouse a Baxter or is a Baxter Milhouse-ian?

  • Jeremy

    I think there are certainly Milhouse-ian elements in earlier characters (some examples include, Porky Pig, Bullwinkle, Curly – with Bart as his Moe – and, though more a contemporary than predecessor, Steve Urkel), though I do agree that Milhouse has become the perfect example of that type of character.

    Where, however, I feel I must argue with you is in your treatment of Homer. Specifically, when you say that Homer is, "also a truly awful human being. He’s a great character to watch, sure, but how anybody could ever root for him is beyond me." I'll give you that later seasons of the Simpsons turned Homer into nothing more than a dim-witted, often mean-spirited, caricature. Yet there are moments (even whole episodes) from the shows prime where Homer's love and devotion for his family cannot be questioned. It's interesting that you bring up the episode where Kirk sings "Can I borrow a feeling," as that episode highlights Homer's love for Marge. When Homer worries that his marriage might be deteriorating and tries to save it, who isn't rooting for him? After seeing that episode countless times, I still get a tear in my eye when Marge returns home and Homer has a second wedding waiting for her. Similarly, episodes like "Colonel Homer," "A Streetcar Named Marge," "The Last Temptation of Homer," and "The Mysterious Voyage of Homer," among others, show that while Homer and Marge may have some issues, the love they feel for each other always proves to be stronger than Homer's ineptitude. And those examples only deal with Marge, but a clear love for his family can be seen in, among others, any episode that deals with the birth of one of his Children ("I Married Marge," "Lisa's First Word," and "And Maggie Makes Three"). There have also been numerous episodes that specifically deal with the bond between Lisa and Homer, I could name multiple episodes, but I'll stop at simply pointing out that in Lisa's Sax, in the middle of a heat wave, Homer sacrifices the money he saved for an air-conditioner to buy Lisa a saxophone (actually he does this twice, as the episode ends with Homer once again making that sacrifice for his child). I won't even get into Homer and Bart, except to say that while Homer may have chocked Bart countless times, he's also stood up for him and, as a result, taken countless beatings for him. And as for Maggie, well let's just say that Homer would have been a lot better off taking Mr. Burns' money for Bobo, but his love for his daughter made that impossible.

    Even outside his family, Homer has shown himself to be a genuinely good person numerous times. However misguided Homer's actions may be, they are often undertaken in an effort to help someone ("Burns, Baby Burns," "Much Apu About Nothing," and, at least eventually in, "When Flanders Failed," just to name a few).

    I make this argument not to be a dick who makes long annoying comments on articles, but rather because I love the Simpsons and how complex their characters actually are. I've only recently started watching new episodes again, as for a long time I felt they lost some of the complexity and depth in their characters and turned it into a vehicle for only topical jokes and silly gags. But I truly believe that if you go back and watch what I consider the prime seasons (arguably, about 2-9) you'll find a show that is not only hilariously written, perfectly voiced, and beautifully framed, but also a show that deals with more than simply the lighter sides, but also the trials and tribulations of a family faced with economic struggles combined with an often unforgiving social community. Yet it is through their love for each other, afterall, it's certainly not usually through intelligence or forethought, the Simpson family always manages to persevere. If that isn't the American Dream, than I don't know what is… Or maybe it isn't, either way, it's good television.

  • dwanczyk

    Good article, Chris.

    My favorite Milhouse line is, "So this is what it feels like…When doves cry." Which leads me to my point that half of his funniness comes from the fact that he's so painfully earnest, kind of like a Waldo from Family Matters. And though that comparison's not really accurate in other ways, Milhouse reminds me so much of "the goofy neighbor" that I had to go looking for other stock characters.

    It turns out that a student of Aristotle's, Theophrastus, classified 30 stock types, including Akairia, aka "The Hapless Man." And in commedia dell'arte, there's a stock character named Pierrot, of whom wikipedia says, "The defining characteristic of Pierrot is his naïveté: he is seen as a fool, always the butt of pranks, yet nonetheless trusting."

    Like Milhouse, Pierrot loves and loses the wonderful Columbine, who was "often the only functional intellect on the stage." Does that sound like any Lisa S. you know? No, that's too obvious. Call her L. Simpson.

    Greek Milhouse? Italian Milhouse? Not so far-fetched in a show that once cast Bart and Milhouse in a Dr. Faustus parody.

    Anyway, keep 'em coming.

  • HerooftheBeach

    I've been rewatching the first season of Community, and it's striking to me the way that they evolved Britta from a character who was basically tough and independent to a fault, into one of these types.

    Dan Harmon said in a commentary track that she turned into Charlie Brown, who could very well be the prototypical Milhouse. I don't doubt that these characters have been around since Aristotle's time, but you could drop Milhouse into Peanuts and you'd never have to change a word.

  • http://www.witstream.com/#christian_blair Christian Blair

    A.K.A., The Schlemazel.

    • hypnosifl

      Hmm, but is he a schlemiel or a schlimazel? Googling about the difference I came across this essay on schlemiels vs. schlimazels in Seinfeld, which says "The schlemiel is the active disseminator of bad luck, and the schlimazel its passive victim . . . . [T]he schlimazel happens upon mischance, he has a penchant for lucklessness . . . . The schlemiel’s misfortune is his character. It is not accidental, but essential." So where does Milhouse fit? He doesn't actively make every situation much worse by his attempts to make things better for himself, like the classic schlemiel George Costanza, but then "misfortune is his character. It is not accidental, but essential" does work for Milhouse too, just that in his case it's more a matter of his spinelessness and earnestness (also like Butters) rather than a matter of causing trouble through constant scheming. But maybe this was already part of the joke with classic schlimazels and the description of the article is just a little misleading, I don't know enough about old-school Yiddish humor to say for sure…

  • http://justwhatdoyoucallthis.com Arthur Bath

    Skippy from Family Ties?

  • http://twitter.com/barbituratecat Avy

    Everything's coming up Milhouse!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Brandon-Lattimore/578631358 Brandon Lattimore

    Family Guy seems to be doing this with Meg for awhile, but for some reason it seems to come from actual spite for the character.